The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

A more sustainable sharing economy through design of business models

Steven Curtis. Photo.
Steven Curtis

The sharing economy is said to take advantage of under-utilised goods and services in our economy, contributing to more sustainable consumption. Yet, despite widespread claims in academia and the media, the sharing economy is not sustainable by default. In his thesis Steven Curtis concludes that with careful design of the business models that facilitate access over ownership, the sharing economy can increase intensity of use and material efficiency, contributing to sustainable consumption.

Accommodation sharing may gentrify neighbourhoods and contribute to over-tourism; ridesharing can lead to congestion; and bikesharing and e-scooters have led to an overcapacity of underutilised assets (search bike graveyards in China!).

“We must be deliberate and strategic in how we design sharing economy business models to ensure improved sustainability performance,” says Steven Curtis.

Yet, the sharing economy is defined and operationalised differently by actors across society, which has implications for entrepreneurs, managers, policymakers, consumers, and citizens. How is car rental different from carsharing via ShareNow? How is a taxi service different from ridehailing via Uber? How are hotels or apartment leasing different from short-term accommodation rental via Airbnb? All of these examples facilitate access over ownership, largely the unifying characteristic of the sharing economy, but car rental, taxi service, or hotels would not be considered part of the sharing economy.

Why? Steven Curtis suggests that sharing platforms should facilitate temporary access to an existing stock of goods in a two-sided market. In this way, the sharing platform improves material efficiency and increases the intensity of use of space, mobility, and goods that otherwise would be idle.

However, sharing economy business models struggle to remain financially and socially viable, scale operations, and/or retain prosocial and environmental motivation. In fact, popularised claims suggest that 70-90% of business models fail. Therefore, Steven Curtis proposes knowledge and tools to support the design and implementation of sharing economy business models for sustainability.

“Past academic research and media attention tend to focus on unicorns such as Airbnb and Uber. There is greater need to explore the diverse permutations of business models within the sharing economy, especially considering sustainability”, says Steven Curtis.

 

About the dissertation:

Monday 14 June, Steven Curtis, the International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, defends his thesis entitled Sharing Economy Business Models – Addressing the Design – Implementation Gap. The defense will take place online at 14.15. The faculty opponent is Professor Frank Boons, Director of the Sustainable Consumption Institute, University of Manchester.

Read the full dissertation  

Participate online

 

For more information, please contact:

Steven Curtis
Phone: +46 700 - 597274
E-mail: steven [dot] curtis [at] iiiee [dot] lu [dot] se