Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
You are here

Defining energy security takes more than asking around

  • Aleh Cherp
Publishing year: 2012
Language: English
Publication/Series: Energy Policy
Volume: March 2012
Document type: Journal article (letter)
Publisher: Elsevier

Abstract english

Abstract in Undetermined

The recent contribution by Benjamin Sovacool proposes 20 dimensions and 320 indicators of energy security in Asia. However, the method for identifying these dimensions and indicators – 64 semi-structured interviews – has three shortcomings. First, Asian policy makers responsible for energy security are absent from the pool of respondents dominated by academics. Second, no prioritization or contextualization of energy security concerns is attempted, leading to an excessively long generic list. Third, no disagreements between the interviewed experts are accounted for. Future attempts to define energy security based on perceptions should involve relevant social actors, include mechanisms for discriminating between primary and secondary concerns and find ways to constructively report on disagreements.


  • Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
  • energy security


  • ISSN: 1873-6777
Aleh Cherp
E-mail: aleh [dot] cherp [at] iiiee [dot] lu [dot] se

International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE)

Lund University P.O. Box 196, 22100 Lund, Sweden
Visiting Address: Tegnérsplatsen 4,Lund

Telephone: + 46 46 222 00 00 Fax: + 46 46 222 02 10