The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Luis Mundaca

Luis Mundaca

Professor

Luis Mundaca

Hard-to-reach energy users : An ex-post cross-country assessment of behavioural-oriented interventions

Author

  • Luis Mundaca
  • Sea Rotmann
  • Kira Ashby
  • Beth Karlin
  • Danielle Butler
  • Miguel Macias Sequeira
  • João Pedro Gouveia
  • Pedro Palma
  • Anna Realini
  • Simone Maggiore
  • Mariëlle Feenstra

Summary, in English

Hard-to-reach (HTR) energy users encompass individuals who are physically difficult to reach, underserved, or challenging to engage and motivate in demand-side energy programmes. Given a mix of societal challenges (e.g. inequity, energy poverty, decarbonisation, the COVID-19 pandemic), HTR energy users are receiving increasing attention. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the performance of interventions that target (explicitly or implicitly) HTR energy users, particularly from a behaviour change perspective. Our study addresses this knowledge gap, and aims to provide a systematic ex-post comparative cross-country assessment of nineteen case studies, implemented in eight countries. From a methodological point of view, our study explores and tests the usefulness of applying the ‘Building Blocks of Behaviour Change’ (BBBC) in assessing the extent to which interventions employ design and implementation practices that are known to drive behaviour change. Our findings reveal that interventions perform well with respect to the Audience, Behaviour, and Delivery building blocks, but show room for improvement in the Content and Evaluate blocks. Assessing the BBBC framework reveals promising results in terms of credibility, confirmability, transferability, and reliability; however, limitations and uncertainties are also present. Considering the exploratory methodological nature of our study, the results highlight numerous context-specific factors that frame our findings and the suitability of the research approach. We underscore that greater attention must be paid to both the integration of behavioural science methods into HTR interventions, and the systematic analysis of heterogeneity in future HTR-related energy research.

Department/s

  • The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics

Publishing year

2023-10

Language

English

Publication/Series

Energy Research and Social Science

Volume

104

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Energy Systems

Keywords

  • Behaviour change
  • Energy behaviours
  • Hard-to-reach energy users
  • Heterogeneity
  • Policy evaluation

Status

Published

Project

  • Hard-to-Reach Energy Users

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2214-6296