The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Aleh Cherp

Aleh Cherp

Professor, Coordinator of the MESPOM Consortium

Aleh Cherp

Policy-driven growth of technologies to accelerate climate action

Author

  • Jessica Jewell
  • Aleh Cherp
  • Frank W. Geels
  • Masahiro Suzuki
  • Lola Nacke
  • Jale Tosun
  • Senjuty Bhowmik
  • Tsimafei Kazlou
  • Avi Jakhmola
  • Vadim Vinichenko

Summary, in English

More than 70% of climate policies target low-carbon technologies, with hopes that policy support will trigger tipping points and self-reinforcing growth. In practice, however, trajectories of policy-driven technologies remain difficult to explain and anticipate because their growth is nonlinear and often constrained by backlash, policy reversals and systemic barriers. In this Perspective, we develop a framework to explain, diagnose, and anticipate the growth of policy-driven technologies through four phases. In the formative phase, rapid innovation, uncertainties and frequent failures lead to erratic growth; in the accelerating growth phase, increasing economic and political returns progressively increase deployment speed; in the steady growth phase, emerging barriers dampen acceleration leading to a pattern in which growth pulsates around its peak; and in the slowdown phase, barriers stall growth and technology reaches its limits. Surprisingly, the scale and complexity of supporting policies do not necessarily diminish as technologies mature. Effective acceleration requires phase-specific policies to support technical and commercial viability in the formative phase, amplify increasing returns in the accelerating growth phase, manage barriers in the steady growth phase, and withdraw or reinvigorate support during the slowdown phase. Further advancing this phase-aware understanding of the co-evolution of policy and technology is essential for improving climate policy design and for developing more realistic technology projections and climate mitigation scenarios.

Department/s

  • The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics

Publishing year

2026

Language

English

Pages

235-252

Publication/Series

Nature Reviews Earth and Environment

Volume

7

Issue

4

Document type

Review article

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Topic

  • Environmental Sciences

Keywords

  • SDG 13 - Climate Action

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2662-138X